NBA Gauntlet » Gauntlets

Point Guard Mega Showdown

Harris Beringer — Thu, 15 Dec 2011 20:33:35 +0000

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.

Follow the Leader

These six young point guards have been considered players who can instantly make a franchise relevant. If they were all available (and it seems most of them have been on the market), who would you pick to be the face of your team for the next 5-10 years?

The two players with the most votes will face off next week for PG supremacy.

Chris Paul: 15.9 PPG, 4.1 RPG, 9.8 APG

This perennial MVP candidate is expected to carry the curse of being a Clipper on his knees. He’s expected to lead the underdog LA team to new heights. Lob City.
Just 26 years old, but his peak was 22-23.
Sky-high assist totals and few turnovers despite weak supporting casts.

Deron Williams: 20.1 PPG, 4 RPG, 10.3 APG

A bit of a modern day Isiah Thomas, Deron is intense on and off the court. He also appears to already be acting as a GM in New Jersey.
Impressive scoring and assist numbers, but mediocre rebound and turnover rates.
Showed his wrist has healed by scoring a boat load in Turkey. His team there retired his number after 15 games.

Derrick Rose: 25 PPG, 4.1 RPG, 7.7 APG

Your reigning MVP, a 23 year old PG who attacks the basket and shoots often.
Greatly improved his defense and three point shooting year.
Committed himself to improving his basketball IQ this offseason.
Didn’t make enough shots in the playoffs when pressure increased.

John Wall: 16.4 PPG, 4.6 RPG, 8.3 APG

Completed a successful rookie campaign as the best player from the 2010 draft.
Struggled with right knee tendinitis.
Tall, explosive, and with tons of potential.

Rajon Rondo: 10.6 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 11.2 APG

Perhaps the finest brick mason of any PG in years.
Limits his low percentage shots.
Facilitates the aging Celtics offense, so there aren’t many shots for him anyway.
His long arms and fast feet help him smother his assignments.

Russell Westbrook: 21.9 PPG, 4.6 RPG, 8.2 APG

Very much like Derrick Rose, but a bit less polished.
He needs to work on his jump shot and his defense.
Sets up the offense more, and a better passer than Rose.
Drives to the basket often, and is fouled at the highest rate of this group.
Had a very weak postseason with turnovers and missed shots galore.

Do you go for awards, potential, stats, leadership, defense, or a little bit of each? Is there a clear #1 choice?

Similar Posts:

Chris Bosh vs. Amar’e Stoudemire

Harris Beringer — Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:23:37 +0000

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.

CB4 vs. Stat

The 2010 NBA Offseason enticed fans and general managers with the greatest collection of free agent power forwards ever. Chris Bosh, Amar’e Stoudemire, Carlos Boozer, and David Lee all switched teams (Brian Scalabrine is still looking for a team). Bosh was widely considered the best of the bunch, but LeBron James and Dwyane Wade might have chosen the wrong third banana.

Amar’e Stoudemire has had a more productive career, based on PER, Win Shares, and honors. Although Bosh and Stoudemire have both been All-Stars five times, Amar’e has been All-NBA four times, compared to only once for Bosh. Although Amar’e is criticized for his rebounding, his career rate is similar to that of Chris Bosh. Additionally, the injury-prone label appears to be inaccurate. Amar’e has played over 78 games in a season five times, while Chris Bosh has only reached that mark once.

In the eight games where Stoudemire and the Suns played against Bosh and the Raptors, the results were not very close. The Suns record was 7-1, and Amar’e led the way with his high percentage shooting and defense. Amar’e shot 63%, compared to 51% for Bosh. Amar’e swatted two shots per game, while Bosh blocked just 0.8.

Amar’e Stoudemire will be making more money before taxes this season. So is he worth it, or was Chris Bosh the biggest prize?

Amar’e: 23.1 PPG, 8.9 RPG, 1 APG

He shot better than Bosh on jump shots, close shots, and dunks
He is inconsistent, but has had higher highs
In clutch situations, he shot 62%. Bosh shot 38%
Sports goggles are awesome
His nickname is more than just his initials and number, and he should help reinvigorate Knicks basketball

Bosh: 24 PPG, 10.8 RPG, 2.4 APG

He clearly had better numbers this past season, but maybe he was just playing for the contract
His team has underperformed expectations each year, and has only made the playoffs twice in seven seasons
He thinks he’s a cowboy
Shaq called him the Ru Paul of big men
He had a better hands rating, block rating, and PER last season

Most stats will lead you to believe that Bosh was the better player last year, but Amar’e wins the Win Share battle on the strength of his shooting percentages. Of course, his percentages were likely helped by playing on a Suns team with Nash directing an efficient offense. If you were the general manager of your favorite team, and you had the money to spend, who would you have pursued?

Similar Posts:

Danilo Gallinari vs. Eric Gordon

Harris Beringer — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:44:13 +0000

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.

Rooster vs. EJ, the nickname challenged

With the 6th pick of the 2008 NBA Draft, the New York Knicks selected Danilo Gallinari, a 6’10″ forward with a sweet stroke, questionable defensive ability, limited assists, and a health issue. Some experts clamored for Eric Gordon, the 6’3″ guard with a sweet stroke, questionable defensive ability, limited assists, and a health issue. Danilo was 225 pounds and too thin to defend other forwards. Eric was 225 pounds and too heavy to defend other guards.

Statistical gurus like John Hollinger projected bad things for each of them. Danilo’s shot wouldn’t translate to the U.S. Eric Gordon’s game would fall short of NBA standards, considering his poor shooting percentage and abundant turnovers. Of course, his projections didn’t consider Eric Gordon’s injuries or his style of play.

Each player shows tantalizing potential this season, with increased minutes and excellent shooting percentages. Some still claim the Knicks should have gone with Brook Lopez, who would have transformed the Knicks, at least in theory. If he’s such a good defender, why have the Nets been 24th in the league in defense the past two seasons?

There were two other guys the Knicks should have considered drafting or acquiring. Marreese Speights, picked 16th by Philadelphia, has been the statistical stud of the draft so far. Anthony Randolph has received rave reviews down in Golden State.

Yet since they were focused on a three point shooter to spread the floor, who should they have chosen?

Danilo: 22.7 PPG, 4.7 RPG, 1.3 APG

Just scored a career-high 30 points in one game.
He’s no longer hampered by a back injury.
Danilo’s on pace to nearly double the record for three pointers in a season.
His rooster celebration is one of the best in the game.
He might be able to learn defense from his father, a star European defender in his day.

Eric: 18.8 PPG, 3.8 RPG, 4.0 APG

He has injured his wrist, ankle, and hamstring in the past few years, but appears healthy now.
This season, he has increased his assists and cut down on turnovers.
At PG and SG, he outplayed his counterpart (though still allowed a high PER).
His nickname is EJ. That must be the worst nickname in the league.
He might have played even better if he wasn’t on the worst team last year.

Maybe it’s too early to tell, since number one pick and last year’s rookie of the year, Derrick Rose, is playing like trash. But even if we can’t put too much stock in the current numbers, you can see their abilities. You can imagine their potential. That’s what makes projections fun. Also, don’t say nicknames are pointless. Nicknames are marketable, and a team wants to be able to market its players.

Which rising shooter should have been picked sixth in the 2008 draft?

Similar Posts:

Tayshaun Prince vs. Luol Deng

Harris Beringer — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:09:56 +0000

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.

Tayshaun vs. Deng

Tayshaun Durell Prince grew up in Compton, and moved on up, sorta, to Kentucky and now Detroit. This must have hardened him up, since he has a quite a reputation as a durable defensive specialist. He parlayed this onto a spot on the US Olympic team, and won a gold medal. Clearly, Prince is a glue guy who would be a welcome addition to any other team, right?

A certain Chicago Bull might contest that idea. The Bulls’ starting small forward was once considered one of the top young players in the game, and was part of a proposed trade for Kobe Bryant. However, after one down year, he is now off the radar. He too has an interesting background. Luol Deng is from Wow, Sudan (which sounds pretty exciting). He was overrated, and his defense is nothing special, right?

Well, maybe Tayshan and Luol are a better gauntlet pairing than you may think. Check out the vital stats first:

Tayshaun: 13.2 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 3.3 APG

Has not missed a single game the past five years.
His numbers fell last season, but only because he played fewer minutes per game.
Tayshaun’s assist/turnover ratio greatly improved last season.
Prince has much greater shooting range than Deng.
He has been a winner at every level.
He has been All-Defensive (2nd team) the past four years.

Luol: 17.0 PPG, 6.3 RPG, 2.5 APG

He is five years younger.
Though his per game numbers fell, this was the result of playing fewer minutes per game. His per 36 minute averages remained almost exactly the same.
His team was poorly coached and had no chemistry last year.
Deng shoots at a much higher percentage than Tayshaun Prince.
Deng’s PER is much higher, while Tayshaun is just average (around 15).

In 14 head to head games, each player’s team won 7. Deng, perhaps underrated defensively, has held Prince to 37% shooting. He has drawn two fouls per game from Prince, who normally only fouls about once a game. All evidence points to Deng being underrated, and Prince being supported by some reputation that he has never earned.

Who deserves more recognition?

Similar Posts:

Ron Artest vs. Caron Butler

Harris Beringer — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 04:35:48 +0000

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.

Ron vs. Caron

They’re both 28 years old, prone to missing games, spent two years in college, have been traded a couple of times, and are members of high-powered trios. Artest joins McGrady and Yao this season, while Caron continues to play with Arenas and Jamison.

They each also rank among the league leaders in steals, although Ron Artest is more heralded for his defense.

They each have a somewhat menacing appearance, with Ron sporting large muscles and words shaved in his head, and Caron showing off some ink of a skull on his arm.

These two players have much in common, but their names are not among the similarities.

Ron, short for Ronald, from Queensbridge, NY. He says he grew up in the streets and always follows that code of honor. No one, including fans, may disrespect him or his friends.

Caron is Mr. Butler’s middle name. James Butler, born in Wisconsin, went to high school in Maine and college in Connecticut, does not sound like a very dangerous sort of guy. Naturally, he went with Caron and got the aforementioned skull tattoo.

Background aside, who would you rather have on your team right now?

Ron Artest: 20.5 PPG, 5.8 RPG, 3.5 APG

Each time he missed games, his team was much worse.
He won Defensive Player of the Year in 2003-2004.
He was selected to the 2004 All-Star game.
He played well in his sole All-Star game appearance, unlike Caron.
His PER has improved every year except the 2005-2006 season, when he was traded from Indiana to Sacramento.
Artest had to play with Stephen Jackson, Jamaal Tinsley, and numerous other bad influences.
He is fiercely devoted to his teammates- he now loves Yao Ming.
Knicks fans have been depressed for the last 9 years that the team drafted Weis over him.

Caron Butler: 20.3 PPG, 6.7 RPG, 4.9 APG

He was an All-Star in 2007 and 2008.
Caron’s PER has risen each season except his second, when Miami imported a bunch of new players, and he could never get in a rhythm.
He greatly improved his passing and shooting last year, and helped the Wizards make the playoffs despite a major injury to Gilbert Arenas.
Last year, he had a higher PER and Win Score than Ron Artest.
He has played second fiddle to Arenas, Bryant, and Wade, and clearly plays better without them.
He is less likely to retire, join the Knicks, or release a music album.

In 11 head to head games, Artest has held Butler to 37% shooting. Last season, Butler shot only 29% against Artest. Defense matters quite a bit. Oh, by the way, Ron Artest is now named Metta World Peace.

Who would you rather have by your side?

Similar Posts:

Paul Pierce vs. Carmelo Anthony

Harris Beringer — Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:36:44 +0000

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.

The Truth vs. Melo

In this battle we have the self-proclaimed “best player in the world” against the versatile young snitch-hater.

When Paul Pierce was interviewed by the Spanish newspaper Marca, he revealed that he thinks he is the best player in the world. He attributes this statement to confidence, not conceit.

He also said that LeBron is the most difficult player to defend, Magic Johnson is one of his idols, and his teammates are his favorite players.

In response to a question, he said that Gilbert Arenas is better than Jose Calderon because Calderon has room for improvement, but Arenas is already a superstar. Those years in Spanish class really paid off.

Carmelo has among the most egomaniac websites around. He enjoys photography and blogging, and recently was published by the NY Times. To be fair, many would be doing the same things if in his position.

Last year, Pierce and Anthony were voted All-NBA (3rd team). Their PER and scoring numbers over the past few seasons have been similar. Let’s see the argument for each:

Paul Pierce: 19.6 PPG, 5.1 RPG, 4.5 APG

Pierce won a ring with the Celtics in 2007-2008.
The Celtics were terrible when he missed 2006-2007 with an injury.
He returned from a critical stabbing injury early in his career.
He managed to play with Antoine Walker.
He has been a much more accomplished passer, despite playing on some lousy teams.
Pierce is a better three-point shooter and gets to the line more often than Carmelo.
He never ran away during an NBA fight.

Carmelo: 25.7 PPG, 7.4 RPG, 3.4 APG

He won a gold medal with Team USA at the 2008 Olympic games in Beijing.
Melo had the fifth most popular jersey last year, while Pierce’s jersey was 13th.
He greatly improved his rebounding last year, and had a career high in field goal percentage.
He ranked one spot higher in MVP voting last year.
He only needed one year of college, and he won the NCAA tournament that year.
Pierce has been blamed for Team USA’s past failures.

To level the playing field a bit, consider that Pierce could not put up as great numbers as usual since he was on a team filled with all-stars. In addition, the Denver Nuggets played at one of the fastest paces, which allowed Carmelo to score more often and collect more rebounds.

Which all-star is more justified in his self-promotion?

Similar Posts:

Kobe Bryant vs. LeBron James

Harris Beringer — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:44:48 +0000

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.

Black Mamba vs. King James

Kobe Bryant and LeBron James routinely factor into the discussion for MVP candidates. Each year, they have among the highest scoring averages, PERs, Win Shares, and any other metric commonly used to determine the best basketball player. They also both gave themselves nicknames, which is kind of pompous and uncool.

Last year, LeBron flirted with a triple double for the season, but slowed down a bit as the season progressed. Even so, he still ended up with numbers that would often win the MVP. Unfortunately for him, many players had compelling arguments for the MVP award. The highest rated by many metrics were Kobe and LeBron.

Kobe: 28.3 PPG, 6.3 RPG, 5.4 APG

Kobe won the MVP, followed by Chris Paul, Kevin Garnett, Lebron James, and Dwight Howard.
Kobe was the best player on the second best team in the NBA.
LeBron’s team was just average in a worse conference.
Kobe prides himself on defense and frequently asks to guard the opposing team’s top scorer.
Kobe shoots better from three point range.
He plays more like Michael Jordan, the most popular basketball player ever.
Some voters thought Kobe was “due” for the award after many fantastic seasons.

LeBron: 30 PPG, 7.9 RPG, 7.2 APG

ESPN conducted a poll and determined LeBron should win MVP.
Of course, LeBron had a much weaker supporting cast, so you can’t blame him for winning fewer games.
LeBron also has none of Kobe’s character issues. He has never asked to be traded, was never indicted for a major crime, never changed his uniform number, and doesn’t complain about bad teammates.
LeBron also has posted many great seasons back to back, yet still hasn’t gotten recognition. Also, if they’re including a whole career in MVP discussion, why did Chris Paul end up second?

Did MVP voters made a mistake?

The MVP just counts the regular season, so how do they compare in the postseason?

They have each carried their teams through the playoffs, but could not win a championship without an all-star sidekick.

In NBA Finals, each man faltered when confronted with stifling defense. LeBron and his Cavs were swept in the 2007 NBA Finals by the Spurs, who had won four championships in nine years. Kobe and the Lakers could not handle the intense pressure applied by the Celtics in the 2008 NBA Finals.

If we just compare how each man’s team did against the Boston Celtics last year, LeBron has a definite edge. LeBron and the Cavs pushed the Celtics to 7 games.

Which Nike shoe salesman would you rather have on your team?

Similar Posts:

Dwyane Wade vs. Gilbert Arenas

Harris Beringer — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:25:26 +0000

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.

Pookie vs. Agent Zero

This is from 2008 and it’s hilarious how absurd this argument is now.

Born just 11 days apart, a case can be made for each player.

Dwyane Wade carried the 2005-2006 Miami Heat to an NBA championship, but his frequent injuries and inefficient three point shot have held him back.

Gilbert Arenas, a prolific blogger and Halo player, also happens to put up great stats. He missed most of the 2007-2008 season with a knee injury, but has been durable for most of his other seasons.

Since half of Gilbert’s games played last season were basically a rehab assignment, we’ll use 2006-2007 stats to compare the two. In that season, Arenas was All-NBA 2nd team, Wade was All-NBA 3rd team. The previous year, the honors were reversed.

Wade: 27.4 PPG, 7.5 APG, 4.7 RPG, 2.1 SPG

Arenas: 28.4 PPG, 6.0 APG, 4.6 RPG, 1.9 SPG

These numbers are certainly comparable. If you add in an argument about Wade’s higher FG%, you can counter with Gilbert’s better 3PT%. Wade assisted on a higher percentage of his possessions, but also turned the ball over far more.

Many of Wade’s teammates on the US Olympic team say he’s healthy and better than ever. But could he break down again? Arenas had a summer to recover from his latest injury. Will the upcoming season be a showcase of each star’s return to prominence?

Which charismatic superstar would you rather have on your team?

Similar Posts:

Baron Davis vs. Chauncey Billups

Harris Beringer — Sun, 03 Aug 2008 16:57:59 +0000

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post's poll.

Boom Dizzle vs. Mr. Big Shot

In this gauntlet matchup, we have the point guard who left his Warriors at the altar for the Clippers going against the PG who disappeared for the Pistons in the 2008 playoffs. That said, each floor general has had remarkable success over the past few years after spending years unable to capitalize on their talent.

Last year, each player put up all-star stats:

Baron Davis: 21.8 PPG, 7.6 APG, 2.3 SPG

He helped bring Golden State back to respectability.
Baron has a much cooler nickname.

Chauncey Billups: 16 PPG, 6.8 APG, 1.3 SPG

He won a ring with the Pistons in 2004.
Chauncey is regarded as a clutch shooter.

Based on the numbers NBA.com highlights, Baron Davis is a much better player.

However, Chauncey Billups excels in less-heralded stats such as True Shooting Percentage.

Plus, although Baron Davis racks up more assists per game, he also has many more possessions, and gets assists on a smaller percent of his possessions. So, which do you think is more important- getting an assist each time you have the ball, or having the ball more often because your team needs you to?

As a result of higher shooting percentages, lower turnover rate, and higher assist rate, Billups actually accumulated more Win Shares and Player Efficiency Rating. Unsure what that means? Check the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ).

Who would you rather have on your team?

Similar Posts: